Mitsubishi

A purchaser or a lessee of a car possesses a number of protections under both state as well as federal laws in case the car does not operate as it should while under the manufacturer’s warranty. Warranty legislation is often challenging, and can be difficult to explain comprehensively in a brief space. The information below provides some basic information regarding the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act and the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act, namely, what is popularly referred to as “Lemon Law.”

California’s Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act, commonly referred to as the California Lemon Law, was enacted in order to provide relief to purchasers from problematic consumer vehicles and other consumer goods. Commonly, the California Lemon Law pertains to cars, trucks and other vehicles when the authorized service providers and dealerships are not able to repair the consumer good during the warranty period after being given an acceptable number of repair opportunities. For eligible claims involving car, trucks and other vehicles and consumer goods, the manufacturer should give the consumer his or her money back, pay down the remaining loan or substitute the consumer good with one that is substantially similar.

If the consumer is the prevailing party, the California Lemon Law requires the manufacturer to pay for the consumer’s attorney’s fees and costs. This makes the lemon laws financially feasible for those who would otherwise not be able to retain a lawyer.

If you have have one of the Mitsubishi models below and have constant problems with your new or used vehicle, you may have a lemon claim.

Below is a list of Mitsubishi Models that we have seen lemon issues.

• Mitsubishi Eclipse Spyder GT
• Mitsubishi Eclipse 4-cyl.
• Mitsubishi Endeavor
• Mitsubishi Galant 4-cyl.
• Mitsubishi Lancer ES
• Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution
• Mitsubishi Lancer Ralliart
• Mitsubishi Outlander 4-cyl.
• Mitsubishi Outlander Sport
• Mitsubishi Outlander V6